No one in Judge Burns’ courtroom was more surprised when Brent Wilkes marched up to the witness stand this morning than the government prosecutors. I would have been pretty nonplussed if I, too, had been given assurances that Wilkes would not be testifying. But it was an effective bit of legal strategy by defense attorney Mark Geragos, and Wilkes scored points while the government fumbled its hastily-prepared cross-examination.

Unlike the government, Wilkes was ready. He had waited two years for this day, maintaining his innocence in the face of enormous pressure to plead guilty and be done with it, and this was finally his chance to tell his story and confront his accusers. His children were in the gallery to watch dad testify (except for the part about the prostitutes).

Wilkes insisted that he never bribed anybody. He never asked anybody to support a project unless they believed in it. No, he didn’t ply Duke with food and drink to get him to do his bidding. Yes, he did try to buy the congressman’s yacht for $100,000, but he made no secret of it.

The $525,000 payment on Cunningham’s mortgage? That was an investment, which he even tried to get back. As for the two escorts that the government brought from Hawaii to testify about their night with Wilkes and Duke, well, Wilkes said he had never seen them before. He had an answer for every dirty charge the government had made against him.

For his testimony to be true:

1. Mitch Wade must be lying.
2. Joel Combs, Wilkes’ nephew, must be lying.
3. The escorts must be lying.

So Wilkes was essentially making a huge wager that jurors would believe he was taken advantage of by a double-crossing Mitch Wade, his incompetent nephew, and a corrupt congressman, not to mention the overzealous government investigators who ruined Wilkes’ career and his marriage.

We were all curious what the government would do on cross, but Geragos’ maneuvering left Halpern with less than an hour to prepare. It showed. His questions were argumentative and off the mark. Several attempts to impeach Wilkes failed because Halpern couldn’t get the documents he needed admitted as evidence.

Halpern did elicit this bit of CIA humor when he asked whether Wilkes told his employees to cover up the wrongdoing with Cunningham. (Remember Wilkes’ best friend was Kyle “Dusty” Foggo, the former executive director of the Central Intelligence Agency.)

I believe you’re referring to the phrase, ‘Admit nothing, deny everything and make counteraccusations. It’s a CIA saying. It’s a joke.

At other times, the prosecutor lost control of his witness. He allowed Wilkes to trash the government’s witnesses and deliver a ringing endorsement of earmarks:

Earmarks are not dirty things and earmarks are an alternative to a bureaucracy being in complete control of the budget.

Instead of challenging this (bridge to nowhere, anyone?) Halpern only rolled his eyes in disbelief.

It dawned on me that Halpern was trying to run out the clock, stalling until the end of the day so he could regroup and prepare for a proper cross. But in the meantime, he afforded Wilkes a prime opportunity to connect with the jury at the government’s expense.  Jurors were cracking up at Wilkes’ jokes and smiling when he shook his head at Halpern’s questioning.

Halpern will resume his cross on Tuesday.

Readers of my book will recall that when the FBI searched Congressman Randy “Duke” Cunningham’s mansion in 2005 they came across a copy of a letter that defense contractor Brent Wilkes had sent the congressman. Enclosed with the letter was a video of all-day drive trip in the waters off the Big Island that Wilkes had arranged for Cunningham, who is now serving more than eight years in prison for accepting millions of dollars in bribes.

Wilkes is now on trial in San Diego for supplying Cunningham with more than $600,000 in bribes. In court, prosecutors showed a bit of the video last week as they wrapped up their case against him. (Note that it’s silent until the end)

It was one of the most powerful pieces of evidence presented in court. There’s something so surreal about this video, from the self-referential joke at the beginning to the Rodgers and Hammerstein reference at the end. It’s about a clear a portrait of corruption as I’ve ever seen. The dive trip cost more than $2,000, which was a fraction of the $50,000 cost of the trip. Wilkes put Cunningham up in the $6,600-a-night Hapuna Suite. There was a golf outing. Kona lobster was served on the suite’s private lawn. And on consecutive nights, prosecutors say that Wilkes paid for two different escorts for Cunningham. Continue reading →

Almost every day, Brent Wilkes’ defense attorney, Mark Geragos, has been complaining about how hard he’s been working on his client’s defense. Your honor I was up till two in the morning last night. Your honor I need another day to prepare. Your honor, the prosecution dumped all these documents on me. And so on.

The prosecution wrapped up its case on Wednesday. The judge made it clear that Geragos had to start his defense the following day. So what was he doing the night before?

Talking to Dr. Phil about how to defend accused child rapist Chester Stiles, WHO’S NOT EVEN HIS CLIENT. See for yourself:

And I thought I heard him say during jury selection how seriously he takes the responsibility of having a man’s life in his hands. Wilkes is facing 14 counts of money laundering, fraud, conspiracy, and bribery. C’mon, Mark! Brent, are you reading this?

Mitch Wade would write these little notations on his checks to Duke like this one, which mentions something about advertising:

He explained the reason for this in court.

It was so he could deduct the bribe as a business expense!

Not long after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, Randy “Duke” Cunningham redirected $4 million in terrorism dollars at the request of Brent Wilkes and Mitch Wade, the two guys who were bribing him (allegedly, in Wilkes’ case).

The money went to pay for a bullshit document-scanning program called Global Data Infrastructure Capture.

Mitch Wade boasted about it in Dec. 31, 2001 status report to Wilkes, who was then paying Wade hundreds of thousands of dollars for this kind of work:

This was Wade’s solution to the problem of a DoD official had been “playing games” with the money. In other words, it went to somebody else, for something more worthwhile.